Evidence of a professional hit on Charlie Kirk forces the FBI to U-turn on lone gunman theory

Over the past couple of weeks I’ve been called every name under the sun, mainly “conspiracy theorist”, for pointing out the holes in the claim that Charlie Kirk was killed by a lone gunman, namely Tyler Robinson. Well, those people should eat humble pie because we can now demonstrate the lone gunman theory is BS. The evidence is so strong, even the FBI is not denying it.

Just hours after rumours the FBI was prematurely closing its investigation, Kash Patel put out a statement in which he acknowledged: the location of the shooter could be wrong, the shooter might have had accomplices, and people in the crowd were apparently giving hand signals. He ackowledged the transportation and concealment of the huge rifle needs to be examined, as do the dodgy text messages, and the bullet impact and trajectory.

We are meticulously investigating theories and questions, including the location from where the shot was taken, the possibility of accomplices, the text message confession and related conversations, Discord chats, the angle of the shot and bullet impact, how the weapon was transported, hand gestures observed as potential “signals” near Charlie at the time of his assassination, and visitors to the alleged shooter’s residence in the hours and days leading up to September 10, 2025.

Regarding specific details, such as questions about the plane that allegedly turned off its transponder after departing from an airport near the assassination site, we can share updates when answers are confirmed. After interviews with the pilot and consultation with the FAA, we determined the transponder was not turned off. Incomplete flight data in rural areas caused the apparent gap.

Patel’s statement essentially acknowledges the original theory of a lone gunman is full of holes and the “conspiracy theorists” have been doing the job of the FBI.

While it might seem like Patel is making a sincere attempt to address our concerns, the fact remains his FBI tried to cover up the truth. It was his FBI that released those bogus text messages, and told us there was no exit wound, and the bullets were transgender, and Tyler Robinson’s screwdriver was left on the roof, and a bunch of other nonsense that I’ve covered in previous articles.

Patel is now talking like a serious investigator because his propaganda has failed to convince anyone. He will be frantically working on a new narrative to cover all the plot holes. I expect whatever he comes up with to be as laughable as those ChatGPT text messages. I read a far-right blog which came up with a theory this was a professional hit by a pro-LGBT gun group. Please don’t give Kash ideas, people!

It was only when Patel was forced into a corner that he accepted the inconsistencies in the lone gunman story needed to be addressed. This was not some innocent fuck up from an incompetent man (although he is certainly incompetent). Patel must have known from the beginning that he was talking bullshit.

For example, CCTV had a clear view of the rooftop and should have recorded the shooting, if indeed that was the location of the shooter. However, the footage has not been released.

The FBI must already know if that’s where the bullet came from, but Patel is saying this needs to be investigated. Either he never looked at that CCTV or he knows the shooter was at another location and whoever was on that rooftop was a decoy.

A person who recorded the alleged shooter on the rooftop described him as wearing full tactical gear, including a mask, and carrying a much smaller gun than the one the FBI found. Candace Owens shares the footage and discusses it here:

If this person is the gunman, it means the FBI lied about the outfit, murder weapon and bullet. If this person is a decoy (which I think is more likely), it means the FBI lied about the murder weapon and bullet. Either way, the FBI has to be lying. This has to be a professional hit.

As gun experts keep pointing out, a 30-06 bullet is capable of disintegrating the bones of a 1,300 lb elk. Just look at the size of the bullet on the left.

It was initially suggested Kirk was wearing a bullet proof vest, and the bullet ricocheted off the vest and went into the neck. However, Kirk’s wife has confirmed he wasn’t wearing a vest and these bullets are capable of penetrating most bullet proof vests anyway.

The FBI must have known that a 30-06 bullet would decapitate someone if they were shot in the neck. It must have known the claim about Kirk having bones of steel is nonsense. Kirk was clearly killed by a smaller bullet from a less powerful gun, whether that bullet came from the rooftop or elsewhere.

Here is footage of a weird hand-off moments after Kirk was shot. Was this guy being handed the bullet? Or maybe the murder weapon? What was going on here?

The reason I think the shooter was not located on the rooftop is that footage shows a blood splatter just below Charlie Kirk’s right ear from a possible entry wound. It appears the neck wound was the exit wound, and we were lied to about the bullet being found inside Kirk.

The reaction of Kirk’s body is consistent with his spinal cord being severed. If you watch in slow motion, you can see this reaction before the wound on his neck has even appeared. This strongly suggests the neck wound is the exit wound.

Here is an alternative possibility: the blood splatter came from an exit wound and the neck wound was the entry wound. I know the neck wound looks more like an exit wound, but this video made me stop and think.

I tried to upload the video, but Substack wouldn’t accept it so just click on the link. It shows someone who is allegedly on Kirk’s security team possibly firing a small weapon concealed in his hand. Whatever he is doing, his reaction to the shooting certainly looks odd, like he is maybe concealing a weapon.

Obviously, I’m not a ballistics expert and I can’t say for certain where the shot came from, but I can say it was not a 30-08 bullet that killed Kirk. Therefore, the above clip and other clips showing alternative suspects need to be thoroughly investigated.

We have been told one lie after another by the FBI and I have no confidence we will ever be told the truth, but that does not mean we should stop demanding the truth. Here is a good video covering some of the points I’ve made above and a bunch of others:

My initial assumption was that Mossad killed Kirk, given how weird Israel was being and how they had a clear motive. However, given the other things going on in the US, I think this happened with the full knowledge of the Trump administration.

Not only has the FBI been caught lying about the Epstein case, it has also been caught lying about the ICE shooting. Just look at the ridiculous “anti-ICE” messages on the bullets.

As everyone keeps pointing out, why would someone who is anti-ICE kill migrants rather than ICE agents? And why would they write “anti-ICE” rather than a popular slogan such as “abolish ICE”? It’s the “transgender messages” on the bullets thing all over again.

Given the US is murdering Venezuelan fisherman to try to start a war, I’m gonna suggest the US is pursuing a broader strategy of murder to fulfil political objectives. That includes murdering Charlie Kirk and it includes murdering people at ICE facilities.

Every time one of these killings takes place, they are pushing their narratives hard: it was Venezuelan drug smugglers, it was Antifa, it was the transgenders, it was Islamists. They are responding in the most irresponsible manner and they are being caught lying again and again. We tried to warn you these people are fascists and no one is safe from fascists, not even their supporters. Well, here we are…

---

Thank you for reading. All of my content will always be freely available, but if you wish to support my work, you can do so at Ko-fi or Patreon. Likes, shares and comments also help massively.