The FBI's Tyler Robinson story has completely fallen apart

We now know beyond any reasonable doubt that we are being lied to by the FBI about the killing of Charlie Kirk. While it was already obvious, the narrative has become so ludicrous and contradictory, only a fool would take it seriously.

Let’s start with the disastrous interview with Kash Patel, who it turns out is so woefully inept, he can’t even tell a convincing lie. The FBI director spoke to Fox News where he made some laughable claims. He insisted we know Tyler Robinson is Charlie Kirk’s killer because he left a note, but we can’t show you the note because it was destroyed, but it honestly existed so you’re gonna have to trust us.

Patel claimed the note said: “I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m gonna take it”. How convenient… I can’t be bothered to fully quote Patel because what he said was such a convoluted mess so here is a clip. Enjoy.

Patel insisted that we know Tyler Robinson “subscribed to left-wing ideology” because his family said so. Also, he said, “Friends have confirmed that there was kind of that deep, dark internet, the Reddit culture, and these other dark places of the internet where this person was going deep.”

We do not have a shred of evidence to back up this claim. We were told that Robinson had planned the killing on Discord, talking with his roomate about the gun, location, and changing clothes. Why would he not talk to his roommate in person instead of leaving evidence like that? If the roommate was involved in the planning, why weren’t they arrested?

This story has now been simplified to say Robinson confessed to his friends on Discord, so presumably the planning story was made up? Weird thing is Robinson does not even have a digital footprint, but here is the real zinger:

Patel told us that we know the gun found in the woods was that of the killer because DNA matched the DNA that was left on the screwdriver on the roof. There are some massive plotholes here…

Firstly, disclosing DNA test results and implying someone’s guilt violates DoJ rules and due process. These rules can be found in the DoJ's Justice Manual (Section 1-7.000 on Media Relations) and are designed to prevent prejudice to a defendant's right to a fair trial. This means even if Robinson was the killer, this case could be thrown out under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Nice work.

Then there is the fact you don’t use a screwdriver to disassemble a gun like this, you use a hex wrench / allen key as well as other tools. We were told the killer reassembled the gun in the woods. How did he do this if the screwdriver was left on the roof?

TMZ has pointed out the shooter was recorded a quarter of a mile away on 800 W Street, just 31 minutes before the shooting. This means he had to limp a quarter of a mile with the 24-inch barrel in his trouser leg, climb onto the roof, assemble the gun and get into position in 31 minutes.

Remember, these guns are not easy to assemble and he was using a screwdriver, not a hex driver. I’ve watched videos of people disassembling similar guns and I found a good description on Twitter of how difficult it is:

Technical note from a lifelong precision rifle guy, a full sized Mauser 98 (which is a long action) in 30-06 is a beast- at least 45" in length. Like with almost all bolt actions, the barrel is threaded into the receiver sandwiched between a recoil lug. Typical torque is around 125 ft lbs for a barrel to action. You need a special tool just to remove it, many times during a re-barrel I have had to use a torch to heat the receiver enough to loosen the barrel.

So there is almost no chance this was a real takedown rifle, they do exist (and there are a lot of bolt action rifles that allow removal of the barrel) but there is no way a standard Mauser 98 style action can do that. That means the rifle had to be carried around in a container, cardboard box or otherwise, that was full length- it sticks out visually - like you can see it from a 100 yards, it's obvious.

None of this adds up.

We were told Robinson had driven to the location the day before, apparently to drop off the rifle in the woods for collection. Why not take the rifle along on the day? Why complicate things?

The official story is that the shooter drove to the campus four hours before the killing, so why was he walking along 800 W Street shortly before the killing, preumably with a rifle barrel stuffed in his trousers, only to walk back again?

The woods are in the opposite direction to 800 W Street so presumably Robinson went one way to collect the weapon and then walked past the college for a quarter of a mile or more, only to turn around.

How did Robinson get onto the roof and resassemble a complex rifle so quickly with a screwdriver and also change his clothes?! How did he reassemble the rifle in the woods without the screwdriver and why did he bother? (Remember, the gun experts are saying this would be highly difficult, if not impossible, even with the screwdriver.)

We are told that after the killing, Robinson supposedly returned to the woods to drop off the gun, placing it in a box that he wrapped in a towel. He was not carrying the box, so he must have returned to the exact spot to locate the box. Why slow down the get away like that?

Robinson must have driven to campus, walked to the woods (southwest of campus), dropped off the box, walked back to campus, walked a quarter mile past campus to 800 W Street (north of campus) for no apparent reason, walked back to campus again (with a limp), carried off the killing and then returned to the woods and returned to the car.

Why not just take the gun in the car, drive away and dump it? Why leave the gun in a small woodland right next to the college? Why do any of this nonsense?

The FBI’s gun recovery story makes as much sense as finding those passports in the rubble of the twin towers! As everyone keeps pointing out, the officer who found the gun must have been wearing a body cam so can we please see the footage?

You know what else would be handy right now? Footage from the camera that was behind Kirk, the one that was removed after the killing before the FBI arrived at the scene.

Not only was that camera a crucial piece of evidence that was tampered with, but it looks like no serious investigation is taking place. Shockingly, the grass where Kirk was killed is already being paved over. They haven’t even found the bullet yet and they’re paving over a crime scene? If this doesn’t smell like a cover-up to you, I don’t know what to say.

---

Thank you for reading. All of my content will always be freely available, but if you wish to support my work, you can do so at Ko-fi or Patreon. Likes, shares and comments also help massively.