Col. Qaddafi tried to become friends with the West in the later years of his rule but that still didn’t prevent Hillary Clinton from gloating at his gruesome assassination.
Of course our allies can do whatever they want, Remember Alliance involves taking sides. Only neutral countries like Switzerland don't have allies. Switzerland doesn't need allies because it holds all those dirty little secrets that might embarrass a government.
We need allies because we're week but greedy. Surprisingly we haven't noticed but nobody needs us any more. We're only 'independent' because we're a joke country and we have grovelling down to a fine art.
And of course there won't be blowback, at least not in the next few weeks. But when there is, including God forbid a Manchester type of horror show, we - but not the BBC and other traitors - will know who to blame. I don't suppose the "rehabilitation" of HTS goes so far as to allow those headchoppers entry to the UK - or does it? Either way Starmer and Lammy have let it be known yet again that they don't work for us, they work very hard for the US empire.
"Still, to see the empire open their arms for terrorists they’ve been fighting since 2001 is disturbing."
It's the only part of this excellent piece I can't quite digest. When have they ever fought any of their terrorist buddies? Their fickle friends are usually inserted as a pretext to erase a country's infrastructure.
Opening their arms for terrorists they've claimed to have been fighting since Demolition Day, 11 September 2001.
Sounds just like a typical CIA operation to me. They have one template that they have used for almost 80 years. The use of that template has been influenced, more or less by the perpetual incompetence of those individuals running the CIA's crooked little operations.
How about we just butt out and leave the Middle East alone? All of us westerners, white people. Anyone who's upset about removing HTS from the "terrorist list" is just as hypocritical as the elites and the military-industrial complex they claim to oppose. Let’s be real: we should just butt out, stop interfering, and let the people there decide their own future and who they want in charge. If they think HTS are terrorists, let them handle it. If they want Bashar back, let them have him. Stop pretending you’re some benevolent force and better than the “bad empire” — you’re just as deceitful, with your own agenda. You’re no different than the powers you criticize, using different boots but the same mentality.
You're not trying to stop the empire from putting boots on the necks of Middle Easterners, you're just looking to put your own boots on them instead. Different boots, same mentality. White elites still think they have a monopoly on running the lives of brown people, and it's time we face the truth about that. It's not about helping, it's about control. How about we just leave them alone to figure out their own future for once?
But the brown people live on top of the liquid black gold. So they have to be killed, how else? It was fine when it was just desert, but the fact that there is oil under the sand means that they shouldn't really be there. They might use the money to figure out their own future, all by themselves.
Most importantly, why would you want to buy oil if you can steal it?
My baby was 1 year old on 9/11. I remember being told we had to go to war to defeat 'Al Qaeda" because they bombed the Twin Towers. Now, we need to love "Al Qaeda" because they love us and more - they love Israel.
Every thread of 'Why are we backing Israel?' and 'Why is our foreign policy aligned directly with the wants of Netanyahu?' and to a lesser extent - 'Why are we allied to the House of Saud?' - all seems to go back to the World Trade Towers and to 9/11.
I cannot get the dancing Israelis (and the memory-holing of so many stories during that week) out of my mind - nor have I ever forgotten the PNAC papers with their call for a new Pearl Harbor.
Shouldn't the UK police be arresting everyone saying a king word about HTS and those who talk about not calling it a terrorist group? They are still officially a terrorist group so any show of support for them must be illegal, arrest Starmer, and all the rest.
and why on earth are we backing Israels invasion of Syria without raising an eyebrow?
I note you mention Andrew Mitchell's comments. Whatever his politics, he has vastly more expertise in this issue than anybody in the Labour party - but I suppose that is why he won't be heeded, as he is likely to be right.
Fuckin rat 🐀
Col. Qaddafi tried to become friends with the West in the later years of his rule but that still didn’t prevent Hillary Clinton from gloating at his gruesome assassination.
Of course our allies can do whatever they want, Remember Alliance involves taking sides. Only neutral countries like Switzerland don't have allies. Switzerland doesn't need allies because it holds all those dirty little secrets that might embarrass a government.
We need allies because we're week but greedy. Surprisingly we haven't noticed but nobody needs us any more. We're only 'independent' because we're a joke country and we have grovelling down to a fine art.
And of course there won't be blowback, at least not in the next few weeks. But when there is, including God forbid a Manchester type of horror show, we - but not the BBC and other traitors - will know who to blame. I don't suppose the "rehabilitation" of HTS goes so far as to allow those headchoppers entry to the UK - or does it? Either way Starmer and Lammy have let it be known yet again that they don't work for us, they work very hard for the US empire.
"Still, to see the empire open their arms for terrorists they’ve been fighting since 2001 is disturbing."
It's the only part of this excellent piece I can't quite digest. When have they ever fought any of their terrorist buddies? Their fickle friends are usually inserted as a pretext to erase a country's infrastructure.
Opening their arms for terrorists they've claimed to have been fighting since Demolition Day, 11 September 2001.
What an incredibly well written article
Sounds just like a typical CIA operation to me. They have one template that they have used for almost 80 years. The use of that template has been influenced, more or less by the perpetual incompetence of those individuals running the CIA's crooked little operations.
Hear me out!
How about we just butt out and leave the Middle East alone? All of us westerners, white people. Anyone who's upset about removing HTS from the "terrorist list" is just as hypocritical as the elites and the military-industrial complex they claim to oppose. Let’s be real: we should just butt out, stop interfering, and let the people there decide their own future and who they want in charge. If they think HTS are terrorists, let them handle it. If they want Bashar back, let them have him. Stop pretending you’re some benevolent force and better than the “bad empire” — you’re just as deceitful, with your own agenda. You’re no different than the powers you criticize, using different boots but the same mentality.
You're not trying to stop the empire from putting boots on the necks of Middle Easterners, you're just looking to put your own boots on them instead. Different boots, same mentality. White elites still think they have a monopoly on running the lives of brown people, and it's time we face the truth about that. It's not about helping, it's about control. How about we just leave them alone to figure out their own future for once?
But the brown people live on top of the liquid black gold. So they have to be killed, how else? It was fine when it was just desert, but the fact that there is oil under the sand means that they shouldn't really be there. They might use the money to figure out their own future, all by themselves.
Most importantly, why would you want to buy oil if you can steal it?
My baby was 1 year old on 9/11. I remember being told we had to go to war to defeat 'Al Qaeda" because they bombed the Twin Towers. Now, we need to love "Al Qaeda" because they love us and more - they love Israel.
Every thread of 'Why are we backing Israel?' and 'Why is our foreign policy aligned directly with the wants of Netanyahu?' and to a lesser extent - 'Why are we allied to the House of Saud?' - all seems to go back to the World Trade Towers and to 9/11.
I cannot get the dancing Israelis (and the memory-holing of so many stories during that week) out of my mind - nor have I ever forgotten the PNAC papers with their call for a new Pearl Harbor.
We live in interesting times.
Starmer, Starmer, yet another drama,
Couldn’t be more woolly if his mother was a lama.
Apologies- that’s all I got for comment on these creeps.
I see a Boomerang here...........all will come back to haunt our terrorist Democrats/Republicans and British.
👏👏👏
"saying a kind word"
Shouldn't the UK police be arresting everyone saying a king word about HTS and those who talk about not calling it a terrorist group? They are still officially a terrorist group so any show of support for them must be illegal, arrest Starmer, and all the rest.
We should ask Starmer if he would want them in the UK. Though if he says yes I for one wouldn't be reassured.
and why on earth are we backing Israels invasion of Syria without raising an eyebrow?
I note you mention Andrew Mitchell's comments. Whatever his politics, he has vastly more expertise in this issue than anybody in the Labour party - but I suppose that is why he won't be heeded, as he is likely to be right.
Terrorist - anyone who opposes our agenda.