It’s been a couple of days since comedian Omid Djalili launched a bizarre attack on Zack Polanski, accusing the Green leader of spreading “misinformation” on Twitter.
This is scary stuff. Notice the timeline of events. War starts,use Claude, girls school hit, stop using Claude. Now we are in a war and need to remove a piece of software AI that killed innocence. I’m glad DJT is pulling Claude or Anthropic off the shelves. Is it a Trojan horse? Absolutely !!! This isn’t over and it could get much worse. Pray for America and pray for the world!!🙏🙏🙏
Admit or not admit murdering little girls or destroying hospitals the poisonous "they" can do anything and get away with it. Proof is irrelevant. So is any law you can think of. So is the media. So is the impotent UN. So is the EU. Or Russia. Or China. Or the Gulf. "They" are untouchable. And there ain't nothing "we" can do about it.
Almost predictable that a pedophile in a position of power, hiding from the swarm of pedophilic accusations and accountability would consciously bomb a girls school. He wishes he could bomb the Epstein Files and has certainly supported Bondi in breaking the law. Trump has no vision for AI unless it’s for Trump. And his way out isn’t AI it’s Whisky Breath Hegseth to shame and blame—his defense.
Well said Karen. Entirely possible he started this war at the behest of the occupiers but also to distract from the files, the whole continued pushback against the full disclosure of said files and the documents that have been released being heavily redacted speaks volumes.
The article mistakes the clear legal accountability, makes it seem nebulous, it's not. And mistakes the issue Anthropic is clashing with the Pentagon on. And it appears to do this in order to make some sort of point about the evil of AI (skynet). AI should be regulated with guardrails, but conflating incorrect characterization or making it seem as though AI is to blame in this case, does a disservice to the good work Anthropic is doing in pushing back in a specific area, fully automating the kill chain, which woukd be akin to Terminators.
Bottom line the accountability is on those who authorized the execution of the target list, not the tool used to create the target lists. The appropriate pushback from anthropic is around a closed loop... no "man in the middle."
This is a crime, a human crime with human accountability. Who knows if the US will actually do the right thing, I don't have any faith that they will, but this is not an Anthropic issue. Bad target list can be created just as easily by ignorant and sloppy humans, not as rapidly, but that makes the failure to validate them given the time saved, even more abhorrent.
I see a lot of supposition, but no actual evidence. And the article mistakes the clear legal accountability, makes it seem nebulous, it's not. And mistakes the issue Anthropic is clashing with the Pentagon on. And it appears to do this in order to make some sort of point about the evil of AI (skynet). AI should be regulated with guardrails, but conflating incorrect characterization or making it seem as though AI is to blame in this case, does a disservice to the good work Anthropic is doing in pushing back in a specific area, fully automating the kill chain, which woukd be akin to Terminators.
Bottom line the accountability is on those who authorized the execution of the target list, not the tool used to create the target lists. The appropriate pushback from anthropic is around a closed loop... no "man in the middle." In this atrocity, no one is even suggesting that there was a a fully autonomous kill chain, another term for the absence of human authorization being necessary, a man in the middle. This is a crime, a human crime with human accountability. Who knows if the US will actually do the right thing, I don't have any faith that they will, but this is not an anthropic issue.
No, it would no be ironic if the Trump administration is using leaks to the press to blame the company they are angry at for a terrorist attack that they are too embarrassed to admit they’ve been framed for by their professional IDF terrorist partner/handlers to rope them in to further action. It would be par for the course when you are being strategically outmaneuvered by a much more experienced gangster.
Regardless, we should be reading a report issued by the government paid for by our tax dollars, not reading tea leaves and devining from popcorn trails strung together from anonymous leaks in Europe’s periodicals. Where’s the report we pay for?
I am not sure which fact is more unsettling. The deliberate attack on an all-girls school was criminal, but I am at least as appalled to find that AI may have made this "military" decision.
One way or the other, the perpetrators -- from Trump and Netanyahu down -- should be brought before a court of justice in chains. Instead, they will reap financial rewards while also satisfying their perverse libidinous desires through the suffering they have caused.
Well said Lenny. I wish the perpetrators would face justice (and in a sane, just world, they would) but sadly reality is far from being equitable and just in that manner. The attack was heinous and abhorrent, and the fact that AI, like that used to create email templates, was used to identify "targets" makes this somehow even more appalling. What a great idea, use a technology that operates as a "black box" to make decisions about how to eliminate children using overwhelming force, just unconscionable
It seems non western life has been totally devalued. Also this is ideological and coupled with capitalism’s insatiable appetite for ‘growth’ at any cost we will have forever war with AI at the forefront.
The whole complaint about anthropic was that they wouldn’t automate without human action. In other words, based on what we know, a human being had to deliberately conduct a double tap strike on a building, which is only a terrorist tactic, not a military tactic. The question is who did it and from which military. Blaming the AI company the administration is having an open fight with is a pretty obvious sinister deflection when the whole point of the fight was that the vendor required human intervention.
As with everything AI theres a strong possibility it can hallucinate in its decision and requires human oversight to manage its decision making. If thats not being done where does this all end?
Just because the administration is mad at the vendor for requiring human triggering doesn’t make it okay for them to leak that their AI magically autonomously conducted a terrorist act. In fact it is directly opposite to the facts we know that this could have happened. Someone had to do it, if the fight reported is correct.
https://austinsikora.substack.com/p/a-very-convenient-apocalypse?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=32cg97
Like I would believe an article from this government!
This is scary stuff. Notice the timeline of events. War starts,use Claude, girls school hit, stop using Claude. Now we are in a war and need to remove a piece of software AI that killed innocence. I’m glad DJT is pulling Claude or Anthropic off the shelves. Is it a Trojan horse? Absolutely !!! This isn’t over and it could get much worse. Pray for America and pray for the world!!🙏🙏🙏
Admit or not admit murdering little girls or destroying hospitals the poisonous "they" can do anything and get away with it. Proof is irrelevant. So is any law you can think of. So is the media. So is the impotent UN. So is the EU. Or Russia. Or China. Or the Gulf. "They" are untouchable. And there ain't nothing "we" can do about it.
Rotten innit.
Omid Djalili is just a disciple of the Devil IsRael. The Antichrist.
Almost predictable that a pedophile in a position of power, hiding from the swarm of pedophilic accusations and accountability would consciously bomb a girls school. He wishes he could bomb the Epstein Files and has certainly supported Bondi in breaking the law. Trump has no vision for AI unless it’s for Trump. And his way out isn’t AI it’s Whisky Breath Hegseth to shame and blame—his defense.
Well said Karen. Entirely possible he started this war at the behest of the occupiers but also to distract from the files, the whole continued pushback against the full disclosure of said files and the documents that have been released being heavily redacted speaks volumes.
The article mistakes the clear legal accountability, makes it seem nebulous, it's not. And mistakes the issue Anthropic is clashing with the Pentagon on. And it appears to do this in order to make some sort of point about the evil of AI (skynet). AI should be regulated with guardrails, but conflating incorrect characterization or making it seem as though AI is to blame in this case, does a disservice to the good work Anthropic is doing in pushing back in a specific area, fully automating the kill chain, which woukd be akin to Terminators.
Bottom line the accountability is on those who authorized the execution of the target list, not the tool used to create the target lists. The appropriate pushback from anthropic is around a closed loop... no "man in the middle."
This is a crime, a human crime with human accountability. Who knows if the US will actually do the right thing, I don't have any faith that they will, but this is not an Anthropic issue. Bad target list can be created just as easily by ignorant and sloppy humans, not as rapidly, but that makes the failure to validate them given the time saved, even more abhorrent.
I see a lot of supposition, but no actual evidence. And the article mistakes the clear legal accountability, makes it seem nebulous, it's not. And mistakes the issue Anthropic is clashing with the Pentagon on. And it appears to do this in order to make some sort of point about the evil of AI (skynet). AI should be regulated with guardrails, but conflating incorrect characterization or making it seem as though AI is to blame in this case, does a disservice to the good work Anthropic is doing in pushing back in a specific area, fully automating the kill chain, which woukd be akin to Terminators.
Bottom line the accountability is on those who authorized the execution of the target list, not the tool used to create the target lists. The appropriate pushback from anthropic is around a closed loop... no "man in the middle." In this atrocity, no one is even suggesting that there was a a fully autonomous kill chain, another term for the absence of human authorization being necessary, a man in the middle. This is a crime, a human crime with human accountability. Who knows if the US will actually do the right thing, I don't have any faith that they will, but this is not an anthropic issue.
After the company said that they cannot use Claude for this?
No, it would no be ironic if the Trump administration is using leaks to the press to blame the company they are angry at for a terrorist attack that they are too embarrassed to admit they’ve been framed for by their professional IDF terrorist partner/handlers to rope them in to further action. It would be par for the course when you are being strategically outmaneuvered by a much more experienced gangster.
Regardless, we should be reading a report issued by the government paid for by our tax dollars, not reading tea leaves and devining from popcorn trails strung together from anonymous leaks in Europe’s periodicals. Where’s the report we pay for?
I am not sure which fact is more unsettling. The deliberate attack on an all-girls school was criminal, but I am at least as appalled to find that AI may have made this "military" decision.
One way or the other, the perpetrators -- from Trump and Netanyahu down -- should be brought before a court of justice in chains. Instead, they will reap financial rewards while also satisfying their perverse libidinous desires through the suffering they have caused.
Well said Lenny. I wish the perpetrators would face justice (and in a sane, just world, they would) but sadly reality is far from being equitable and just in that manner. The attack was heinous and abhorrent, and the fact that AI, like that used to create email templates, was used to identify "targets" makes this somehow even more appalling. What a great idea, use a technology that operates as a "black box" to make decisions about how to eliminate children using overwhelming force, just unconscionable
It seems non western life has been totally devalued. Also this is ideological and coupled with capitalism’s insatiable appetite for ‘growth’ at any cost we will have forever war with AI at the forefront.
Nobody should be shocked by Trump killing kids. It's who he is.
Bullseye
AI has failed.
Not Claude, bu the US military has Hit and Killed 168 young innocent girls, there is No Excuse for This Crime!
The whole complaint about anthropic was that they wouldn’t automate without human action. In other words, based on what we know, a human being had to deliberately conduct a double tap strike on a building, which is only a terrorist tactic, not a military tactic. The question is who did it and from which military. Blaming the AI company the administration is having an open fight with is a pretty obvious sinister deflection when the whole point of the fight was that the vendor required human intervention.
Radical left ai company Jesus Christ. Hats almost an oxymoron. If there was one I’d be really intrigued to see what it did.
As with everything AI theres a strong possibility it can hallucinate in its decision and requires human oversight to manage its decision making. If thats not being done where does this all end?
Just because the administration is mad at the vendor for requiring human triggering doesn’t make it okay for them to leak that their AI magically autonomously conducted a terrorist act. In fact it is directly opposite to the facts we know that this could have happened. Someone had to do it, if the fight reported is correct.